Issue with fields

Hi @mfoldbjerg,

The support for nested items in field level security is already in our Jira. It’s in the next sprint, so I believe it should be available in a month or so.

Hi @sscarduzio,

Thanks for the prompt reply. That definitely sounds great. Just to be on the safe side. So support will be added for blacklisting up til “index.mapping.depth.limit” depth (default: 20)? Not that any of the documents we’re planning will be that deeply nested, but currently we are around 7 levels deep at most, so support for something like “~item.nested1.nested2.nested3.nested4.*” would be super.

@coutoPL does this sound ok?

Hi @sscarduzio,

Are there any news regarding this feature ? When might it be available ?


It’s the second task in the line in the current sprint.

Hi @sscarduzio,

Has this feature been released?
If not is there an ETA for when it will be released?

@esmann sorry for the delay on this, but we discovered two security bugs that took priority :frowning_face:

Will try to squeeze this in for next week.

Any news on this? :slight_smile:

@coutoPL do you have an estimate on when we can expect this?

This is next task, so it should be done this month for sure.

Any news with regards to this? - some sort of release outlook would be highly appreciated! We have some impatient external clients whom we cannot service until we have the fix - and we have been putting them off for more than 3 months now…

@AndersBruun, this issue is being currently being worked on.

the improvement is almost ready:

1 Like

@AndersBruun @esmann @mfoldbjerg is any of you available for a pre-release early access to this feature? Would be amazing to have your feedback. Once again, sorry for the delay.

Not a problem - will be glad to try it out

what ES version do you use? I’ll send proper build

version 6.6.2 and 6.8.3 (different clusters)

Any ETA on the builds?

sorry, yesterday we figured out that we have regression bug, so I didn’t want to send you build with the bug. Now it is fixed, so here are the builds:

We’ve now tested the plugin and at least for our use cases it works as promised, so thanks a lot for the added functionality

1 Like